Software Patents and the European Union :: Software Technology Europe Essays

Software opens and the European wedlockIntroductionThe European Council recently approved changes to the European Unions Software visibles directive that will lead the way to widespread patenting of software in Europe.1 If the changes are ratified without modification, then the European Patent authorisation (EPO) will have the ability to grant software patents in much the same manner as the United States Patent Office (USPO). This will lead to m any(prenominal) of the problems that have arisen in the United States. For instance, the USPO is disreputable for issuing patents for obvious software process, such as Amazons 1-click shopping. The granting of these obvious patents has led to a flurry of litigation, where the patent holder tries to excruciate licensing fees for alleged patent infringement. This has led to corporations to try and patent everything below the sun, in order to protect them from getting sued and to create a platform to launch their own litigation/lic ensing extortion from their competitors. It has also created a flood out of patent applications for software, giving the overworked USPO little time to examine and research for any prior art that would invalidate the patent application. After giving a background on software patent history in the European Union, this piece will attempt to analyze the ethical issues of software patents. Do they bring more harm to society than good? Do they upraise innovation and research or do they stifle invention? These questions, along with other issues dealing with software patents, will be examined from a potpourri of ethical perspectives.BackgroundInitially, software was non patentable under European law. This was ordained in the Article 52 of the European Patent Convention of 1973, which states that numeric methods, intellectual methods, business methods, computer programs, presentation of information etc are not inventions in the sense of patent law. 2 However, small changes in E uropean Patent law over the years has led to the patentability of process claims, program claims, and til now computer-implemented inventions, which has led to 30,000 software related process patents.3In 2002, the European Commissions directorate for the Internal Market proposed the creation of a Directive to clarify the patentability of computer-implemented inventions and drop excess at the EPO. However, the Directive only put on paper what the EPO had already been practicing, which was granting unlimited patentability.In September of 2003, a set of amendments to the Directive were voted in by the European Parliament.