No State Sponsors, No Terror argument Research Paper

No State Sponsors, No Terror argument - Research Paper Example Jasper’s article No State Sponsors, No Terror argues that terrorism thrives only with the aid of state sponsorship and support. Terrorism is by nature a clandestine operation and as such, states will not overtly admit complicity in terrorist activities. In this regard, terrorism represents the epitome of irregular warfare and confirms 6th century B.C. Chinese military general Sun Tzu’s contention that â€Å"all warfare is based on deception.† This essay analyses Jasper’s No State Sponsors, No Terror and argues that while the most successful international terrorists have thrived with the aid of material state-sponsorship, terrorism can succeed without state-sponsorship. However, when the international legal definition of state-sponsorship of terrorism is used, it is difficult to anticipate terrorism thriving without state-sponsorship. Therefore, Jasper’s argument that terrorism will fade away without state-sponsorship is correct when the internationa l legal definition of state-sponsorship of terrorism is applied.Summary.Jasper starts out by introducing the reader to Sun Tzu’s The Art of War philosophy which hinges on the concept that â€Å"all warfare is based on deception.† Jasper then moves on to describe the clandestine and secret operations of international terrorism. He describes the work of Hezbollah’s â€Å"terror master,† Imad Fayez Mugniyeh, who happened to operate clandestinely since the early 1980s at the age of 20.